Showing posts with label Nuclear Concerns. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nuclear Concerns. Show all posts

Thursday, October 24, 2019

ISSUES: NUCLEAR ACCIDENTS - LIST OF 93 PLUS GLOBAL NUCLEAR REACTOR MELTDOWNS/FIRES

Just so everyone in aware! 1942 to 2015

Chalk River, Canada

1962 - 2015 – RTG's; 9 Deadly Radioactive Plutonium Reactor Containing Satellites Exploded, Melted And/Or Burned Up On Reentry - Radioactive Heavy Metal Poison Dust Breathed In By Everyone On The Planet, 1 Microgram Is Enough To Kill A Person - 79 Nuclear Reactors Orbiting Earth

1942 – Leipzig, Germany, L-IV Atomic Pile Melts Down

1940-1943 - Chicago Pile I - First US Nuclear Plant Meltdown? - Nuclear Reactor Buried In Woods, Argonne Labs, Cook County Illinois, Red Gate Woods, Radioactive Waste Secretly Dumped Into 2 Mile Creek And Well

1952 - Chalk River, Ontario, Canada, NRX Reactor Melted Down

Wednesday, April 13, 2011

NUCLEAR CONCERNS: Remember Strontium 90? I do and it's now part of the radioactive cocktail out of Japan.

WMD world mapImage via Wikipedia

Well, I do remember Strontium 90 from way back in the nuclear testing age. It was well understood then that there is no such thing as a small dose, since S-90 accumulates in the bone and more and more is deposited as your intake rises ... regardless of the dose levels in the air.

Nevertheless, "officials" in Japan say there is no risk to human health. Garbage!

My thoughts today. Art

*********************


Radioactive strontium detected more than 30 km from Fukushima plant

TOKYO, April 12, Kyodo
Minute amounts of radioactive strontium have been detected in soil and plants in Fukushima Prefecture beyond the 30-kilometer zone around the crippled Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, the science ministry said Tuesday.
It is the first time that radioactive strontium has been detected since the Fukushima plant began leaking radioactive substances after it was severely damaged by the March 11 earthquake and tsunami.
There is no safety limit set by the government for exposure to strontium, but the amount found so far is extremely low and does not pose a threat to human health, the Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology said.
Experts, however, expressed concern that the accumulation of strontium could have adverse health effects. When strontium enters the human body, it tends to accumulate in bones and is believed to cause bone cancer and leukemia.
Samples of soil and plants were taken March 16 to 19 from a number of locations in Fukushima Prefecture.
The government has designated the area within a 20-km radius of the plant as an evacuation zone, while people residing in areas in the 20- to 30-km ring have been asked to remain indoors. On Monday, the government expanded the evacuation zone to some municipalities beyond the 20-km radius where residents will evacuate in around a month.
==Kyodo


Get the pictures and subscribe at: http://fundytides.blogspot.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Monday, April 11, 2011

NUCLEAR CONCERNS: But we are smarter than the Japanese and CANDUs are better?

Internationally recognized symbol.
As the tragedy deepens in Japan, the impacts begin to spread around the world as the links below attest ... But I still hear people saying we are better, ours is safer, it's about the jobs ... While the earth moves closer and closer to the brink we will "fiddle while the earth burns."

It appears that locals are buying dulse to make sure their thyroids are are well stocked with iodine. Yet ... records show that local seaweeds take up the dreaded radioactive iodine-137. Are you folks really sure that you are not ingesting radioactive dulse? Really? It's important. Do you really know?

Look at the results for milk below. It's not funny. And then there is the water leak at Pickering ... another no big deal really! More on that here ...
Art
****************
Japan Nuclear Radiation In Hawaii Milk 2033% Above Federal Drinking Water Limits :theintelhub.com
New EPA milk samples in Hawaii show radiation in milk at 800% above limits for C-134, 633% above limits for C-137 and 600% above EPA maximum for I-131 for a total of 2033%, or 20.33 times, above the federal drinking water limits.
Japan Mulls Raising Nuclear Accident Severity Level To Highest -Kyodo - WSJ.comonline.wsj.com
Japan Crisis Intensifies Doubts on Turning Plutonium Into Mox Fuel www.nytimes.com
The nuclear crisis in Japan has intensified a conflict over a project to turn weapons-grade plutonium into a commercial fuel called mixed oxide, or mox.
New radiation highs in Little Rock milk. http://blogs.forbes.com/jeffmcmahon/2011/04/10/epa-new-radiation-highs-in-little-rock-milk-philadelphia-drinking-water/

Image via Wikipedia
Get the pictures and subscribe at: http://fundytides.blogspot.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Wednesday, April 6, 2011

NUCLEAR: Nanuuks of the North. Something else to keep you awake at night.

Polar countries have been tracking pollution in the Arctic for some time now, including nuclear impacts. Check this map and the amazing proliferation of nuclear plants, accidents, and dumps. Japan's disaster has awakened us to what's really been going on for some time now. More will be coming on the frightening radionuclides that have rained down on the "pristine" arcitc. Be frightened. Be very frightened.


Click for larger version - It will amaze you!

The Arctic terrestrial system is more vulnerable to man-made radioactive contamination than temperate areas. The exposure of people in the Arctic and subarctic is, for the general population, about five times higher than that expected in a temperate area. However, for part of the population the exposure could be more than 100 times higher than expected for similar fallout in temperate areas. The major sources of anthropogenic radionuclides in the Arctic are global fallout from nuclear bomb tests, releases from European nuclear fuel reprocessing plants, and fallout from the Chernobyl accident.


Arctic Council
Web site: www.arctic-council.org
AMAP, P.O. Box 8100 Dep., N-0032 Oslo.
Telephone: +47 23 24 16 35. Fax: +47 22 67 67 06.
E-mail: amap@amap.no
Web site: www.amap.no

Get the pictures and subscribe at: http://fundytides.blogspot.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

OPINION: The Telegraph Journal Editorial Board shamelessly expresses its high opinion of Nuclear Power

This just in from the NB Gristmill Newsletter:
Internationally recognized symbol.Image via WikipediaTHE TELEGRAPH JOURNAL HAS A STRONG OPINION ON NUCLEAR ENERGY

As the Japan Nuclear Catastrophe Continues What is the Alward Government’s Opinion?

Now that the NB people have the Telegraph Journal’s attention about Nuclear Energy in New Brunswick – let’s see how long the Irving-owned newspaper will last in an honest debate about public support for Nuclear Energy in New Brunswick? New Brunswickers should now ask that the Telegraph Journal do more than editorialize about nuclear energy – the public should now ask the Telegraph to delve deep into the past, present and future of nuclear power in New Brunswick.

If you had asked Japanese Nuclear supporters prior to their disaster if such a nuclear incident could happen there, we all know that the answer would have been: “Absolutely Not.” And they would have backed their statement up with all kinds of expert opinion and assurances that all precautions had been taken many times over and that they were prepared for any disastrous eventuality. There were many media and news paper accounts of the Japanese Government, politicians, and nuclear industry specialists all praising the Japan nuclear program and assuring the safety of the Japanese public far into the future.

But guess what happened? An accident happened! An accident that they were not prepared for.

What do New Brunswick nuclear specialists have to say about their nuclear accident preparations? What do New Brunswick politicians and Government officials have to say about Point Lepreau and the New Brunswick nuclear future now – from the stand-point of all the questions being asked about the Japan nuclear industry? Additionally, there are many public questions being posed about many nuclear programs around the world right now. Shouldn’t theNew Brunswick nuclear program be publicly scrutinized as well?

We think the NB public would like to know the answer to those questions from a New Brunswick nuclear perspective.

Today, April 5th, 2011, the Telegraph Journal published a letter written by

RADIATION: Ocean Radiation Soars To 7.5 Million Times Legal Limit

It's happening that quickly and includes cesium as well as iodine-131!  The risks are way to high to be locating reactors by the ocean. Point Lepreau is another total disaster waiting to happen. 

Art
****************************
Japan Increases Fishing Restrictions, As Ocean Radiation Soars To 7.5 Million Times Legal Limit


Gus Lubin | Apr. 5, 2011, 5:58 AM in




Image: wikimedia commons

A fish was caught on Friday midway between Fukushima and Tokyo that contained dangerously high levels of radioactive iodine and high levels of cesium.



This catch has prompted Japan to announce its first legal limits for radiation in fish, according to the AP. Previously Japan had said it was enough to ban fishing in the near proximity of the nuclear plant.


Japan also just announced a huge surge in ocean contamination, as radioactive iodine-131 at 7.5 million times the legal limit was found near the plant, according to Japan Times. Yesterday, levels were only 5 million times the legal limit.


Ocean contamination will probably get worse. Yesterday TEPCO commenced a plan to dump 11,500 tons of radioactive water into the ocean, and it said a leak of even more toxic water could last for months.


Japan, like the Gulf of Mexico during the oil spill, faces a serious economic blow if its fishing industry dries up.
A Complete Guide To Japan's $200 Disaster And How It Will Affect The Global Economy >
Get the pictures and subscribe at: http://fundytides.blogspot.com

RADIATION: Could a nuclear accident impact local fisheries in the Bay of Fundy?

Well to get some idea, the Japanese reactors are dumping radioactive water into the Pacific, an open-ocean area, unlike our enclosed Bay. We should all watch this closely.

I must admit, I become somewhat sceptacle when the fox in the hen house says the fish over there have "acceptable" levels of I-131 and particularly radioactive cesium.

Oh by the way. "The Powers" reduced our sampling sites to only 3 ... 2 near the Point Lepreau reactor and one at Digby for air-borne emissions. Not sufficient! More on that later.

Art
****************************


Click on the flag for more information about JapanJAPAN 
Tuesday, April 05, 2011, 15:00 (GMT + 9)

Fishers in Fukushima Prefecture are asking the government to solve the problems at the Fukushima nuclear power plant and to prevent rumors by providing the public with accurate information. Meanwhile, Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) has begun pouring 10,000 tonnes of low-radioactive wastewater into the sea.

After hearing confirmation on Saturday that radioactive water was leaking into surrounding waters from the No 1 nuclear reactor, the fishers reiterated that rumors about all the seawater being contaminated could impair their livelihoods.

Head of the Soma-Futaba fishery association in Soma, Fukushima Prefecture, Fusayuki Nambu urged the government to release full details on the situation.


"We don't know what damage the radiation leak might cause, because assessment surveys haven't been conducted,” he stressed, reports The Yomiuri Shimbun. “This could give rise to dangerous rumors if people get the impression that all the seawater near Fukushima [Prefecture] is contaminated."

This weekend, three fishery associations in south-central Ibaraki Prefecture -- Oaraimachi, Kashimanada and Hasaki -- issued a statement assuring that the waters of southern Kashimanada are safe. They noted that radiation

Monday, April 4, 2011

RADIATION: Lepreau monitor picks up radioactivity from Japan

Published Saturday April 2nd, 2011
Nuclear: No health hazard to Canadians from infinitesimal amounts, watchdog says
A5
Ian MacLeod
Postmedia News

OTTAWA - Radiation monitors in Ontario, New Brunswick and British Columbia have detected minute traces of radioactive iodine suspected to be from Japan's stricken Fukushima nuclear plant.

The Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission characterizes the quantities of Iodine-131 (I-131) as infinitesimal and stresses there are no health hazards to Canadians.

Bruce Power, operator of the Bruce nuclear generating station on the shores of Lake Huron northwest of Toronto, recently reported traces of airborne I-131 in a small number of monitoring samples.

"It has been concluded that this I-131 is likely due to the result of emissions of I-131 from the Fukushima plant in Japan," the commission said in a news release.

I-131 is produced by the fission of uranium atoms in nuclear reactors and by plutonium (or uranium) in the detonation of nuclear weapons.

Analysis of the Bruce Power samples, taken in mid- to late-March, indicate the effective dose to a person would be approximately 0.03 of a microsievert if a person breathed in this concentration of air, and was exposed externally to this air for an entire month, said the commission. And that does not take into account the radioactive decay that would occur during that time. I-131 has a half-life of eight days.

A sievert measures the biological effect of radiation absorbed. A microsievert is one-millionth of a sievert. A millisievert is one one-thousandth.

On average, Canadians receive about 2.7 millisieverts of ionizing radiation from natural sources in a year.

By comparison, the I-131 detected by Bruce Power corresponds to 0.003 per cent of the CNSC's effective dose limit of one millisievert per year to a member of the public and is an even smaller percentage of the total effective dose from all sources of radiation to which Canadians are exposed.

"The presence of these concentrations of I-131 in the air will not produce harmful effects to the health of Canadians," the commission said.

NB Power, operator of the Point Lepreau nuclear generating station, recently detected even smaller amounts of I-131. Researchers at Simon Fraser University also report finding trace amounts in seaweed and rainwater around Vancouver.

Health Canada sets the safe maximum annual exposure for nuclear workers at 50 millisieverts, 100,000 times the level of Japanese radiation monitored in British Columbia, for example. To put this in perspective, you'll get 0.0001 millisieverts just from eating a banana, about the same as walking through an airport security scanner. And you'd have to walk through 1,000 airport security scans to equal your average chest X-ray.

Get the pictures and subscribe at: http://fundytides.blogspot.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, April 1, 2011

OPINION: WHY IS THE ALWARD GOVERNMENT AND THE NB MEDIA SO SILENT ON WHAT THE JAPAN NUCLEAR DISASTER MEANS FOR NEW BRUNSWICKERS?

Received by email today. Thanks Brook. Good points.
************************
THE NB GRIST MILL April 1, 2011 A New Brunswick Political Newsletter

 
WHY IS THE ALWARD GOVERNMENT AND THE NB MEDIA SO SILENT
ON WHAT THE JAPAN NUCLEAR DISASTER MEANS FOR NEW BRUNSWICKERS?
 
It would not be alarmist for our government to discuss the radiation risk potential of Point Lepreau -- it would be prudent, honest and logical -- given the global concern and the absolute game-changing repurcussions of the Japan Nuclear disaster. But it appears the Alward Government and the New Brunswick Media Community, for some reason, are avoiding this critically important issue to the New Brunswick public. Why is that?

The following (National Public Radio) story should be considered by our politicians and media from a New Brunswick perspective for the future of all New Brunswickers. It surely must give our leaders and media pause, at the very least? Perhaps they will be motivated to begin a discussion on the future of nuclear in New Brunswick? They have a responsibility, as our leaders, to talk about the future of nuclear energy in New Brunswick !

Think about this Quote from the story below: "Essentially, when you reach the Fukushima Dai-ichi stage, the question is, 'Are you prepared for things you haven't predicted?' And the answer is, 'How can you tell?' " he says. "We're certainly prepared for some things we haven't predicted, but [we're not sure] what it is we're preparing for."

Lekhaim from the Gristmill

On today's Fresh Air, New York Times energy reporter Matthew Wald joins Terry Gross for a wide-ranging conversation about the history — and future — of nuclear energy in the United States. Though storage and safety mechanisms are in place, he says, many unknown variables exist that are nearly impossible for regulators to forecast.
Listen to the story here:
 

The Future Of Nuclear Energy In The U.S.

March 31, 2011
A view of the Three Mile Island power plant near Harrisburg, Pa., site of the worst nuclear accident in U.S. history. In 1979, a reactor at the plant experienced a partial meltdown, but radioactive material never escaped containment.
Enlarge Bradley Bower/AP Photo A view of the Three Mile Island power plant near Harrisburg, Pa., site of the worst nuclear accident in U.S. history. In 1979, a reactor at the plant experienced a partial meltdown, but radioactive material never escaped

RADIATION: Another "couldn't happen" happens in BC

Power lines near the Point Lepreau (New Brunsw...
Some may remember my posts about iodine-131 in dulse in the Bay of Fundy. Four points: 1. It can and probably has happened here in NB. 2. The "half-life" is the time (8days) it takes to lose half its radioactivity. BUT it takes another 8 days to lose half of the remaining half and so on and so on. 3. The danger comes from the initial level (concentration) that is taken up by the seaweed. 4. Most radionuclides become deadly when ingested, particularly i-131 which concentrates in the thyroid.

And the officials continue to say the Japan nuclear disaster will not impact their plans for Lepreau.

My thoughts this morning.

Art

******************************
Radioactive material found in B.C. seaweed and rainwater


Low levels of iodine-131 found in B.C. seaweed

Andrea Stockton, staff writer, The Weather Network

March 29, 2011 — Samples taken from rainwater and seaweed in B.C. show low levels of radiation from the damaged nuclear reactor in Japan.


Iodine-131 has a half life of eight days

A research team at Simon Fraser University (SFU) in B.C. say there has been a slight increase in radioactive material in samples of seaweed and rainwater on the west coast.

The rainwater was collected from the campus on Burnaby Mountain and the seaweed was taken near the SeaBus Terminal in North Vancouver. In a news release from SFU, scientists said the radiation from Japan's damaged nuclear reactor was carried by the jet stream and is mixing with sea water and accumulating in seaweed. The same material was detected on March 19, 20 and 25.

Although the team has detected an increase in iodine-131, which is sent into the atmosphere after a nuclear fission, health officials continue to stress that the levels are extremely low and are not a current threat to humans. Iodine-131 has a half life of eight days, so officials say it has a very rapid decay. It is usually used in the medical and pharmaceutical industries.

Since March 11, when the 9.0 magnitude earthquake and following tsunami devastated Japan, it has been a struggle to cool the Fukushima nuclear plant. Scientists predict that iodine-131 will be detected in B.C. for three to four weeks after the Fukushima reactor completely stops releasing radioactivity into the atmosphere.

With files from The Canadian Press and The Vancouver Sun
Image via Wikipedia
Get the pictures and subscribe at: http://fundytides.blogspot.com
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, March 17, 2011

NUCLEAR CONCERNS: Report outlines problems at Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant

Report outlines problems at Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant

March 17, 2011 | 2:28 pm



The reactor at Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant in San Luis Obispo operated for a year and a half with some emergency systems disabled, according to a 2010 safety review by the federal Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

The incident was one of 14 “near-misses” the NRC uncovered in its inspections of nuclear power plants where problems had been occurring. An analysis by the group Union of Concerned Scientists concluded that “many of these significant events occurred because reactor owners, and often the NRC, tolerated known safety problems.”

The NRC found a range of problems at the 14 plants, including poor design, equipment failure, poor training and human error.

The issue at the Diablo Canyon plant, which is operated by Pacific Gas & Electric, involved malfunctioning valves that prevented other valves from opening. The valves were improperly repaired and subsequent tests failed to detect the problem, according to the report.

Analysis by the Union of Concerned Scientists found that the NRC’s inspections suggest that nuclear plants “continue to experience problems with safety-related equipment and worker errors that increase the risk of damage to the reactor core.”

The UCS report also cited three instances in which NRC inspectors aggressively pursued power plant operators to enforce safety standards.

-- Julie Cart

Photo: Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant. Credit: Los Angeles Times

Get the pictures and subscribe at: http://fundytides.blogspot.com
Enhanced by Zemanta